Vancouver Condo Depreciation

It’s The Law

The British Columbia provincial government recently passed regulations(Regulations) pursuant to the Strata Property Act (Act) that require all strata properties with more than four units to have a common property depreciation report completed by December 13, 2013.

The Reason

According to the Act, the depreciation report is to provide estimates for “the repair and replacement costs for major items in the strata corporation and the expected life of those items”. The strata corporation can then use that information to assist it in determining the appropriate mount for the annual contribution to its contingency reserve fund. A depreciation report is already a mandatory requirement or strata corporations in several other provinces and many US states.

The Requirements

Section 6.2 of the Regulations sets out the specific requirements for depreciation reports and examples of the ‘major items that must be evaluated therein. The depreciation report should be prepared by a qualified individual, typically an engineer or architect with proper liability and errors and omissions insurance coverage. In summary, a depreciation report must contain:

  • a physical inventory of the common property, including building systems;
  • anticipated maintenance, repair and replacement costs for common expenses projected over 30 years; and
  • a financial forecasting section that contains at least three cash flow funding models for the contingency reserve fund.

The Hope

The provincial government anticipates that depreciation reports will assist strata owners with the prudent management of their common property by providing information on repairs and replacements that will need to be funded, as well as determining the amount that should be contributed to the contingency reserve fund.

Not Ready for Prime Time

While depreciation reports are now mandatory under the law, the strata corporation may defer obtaining a depreciation report by passing a resolution with a 3/4 majority vote of the strata owners authorizing such deferral. If such a resolution is passed, the deferral would be valid for a maximum of 8 months, and the resolution would then need to be re-passed in order to continue to defer the report. Once prepared, the depreciation report is valid for up to three years, after which it must be updated.

Pay Later

It is important to note that the law does not require that the funding requirements identified in the depreciation report be implemented. While the strata corporation remains in charge of determining the amount of contingency reserve fund contributions, the provincial government has now made it easier for a strata corporation to build up its reserve fund levels by eliminating a barrier which in the past has prevented some strata corporations from meeting the maintenance and replacement requirements of their common property.

Less than 100%

In the past, an annual 3/4 majority vote was required to increase reserve fund contributions beyond 100 per cent of a strata corporation’s operating budget, but that law has now been amended so that a strata corporation can now do so if the strata owners simply pass a majority vote to that effect.

Buyer’s and Banks Want to Know

The depreciation report can serve as valuable disclosure information for potential buyers. In fact, the Property disclosure Statement for Strata Properties provides a specific inquiry regarding the possible existence of a depreciation report. Owners of strata properties can expect prospective buyers to inquire about the existence of a depreciation report and request its production if one has been prepared. Furthermore depreciation reports may be requested by mortgage providers as part of their financial risk assessment process.

Win Win

A strata corporation that has organized its affairs to incorporate long-term planning and integrated maintenance in accordance with a depreciation report will likely be well positioned to maintain its building systems, protect its common property assets and reduce the costs to strata owners associated with unexpected failures of such systems or assets, and the potentially costly consequential damage. If a strata corporation defers the preparation of a depreciation report, it may negatively affect the marketability of strata units as well as the ability of potential buyers to obtain mortgage funding or current owners to obtain refinancing.

Copyright British Columbia Real Estate Association. Reprinted with permission.
Further information here

About Larry Yatkowsky

Larry is a recognized real estate expert. A veteran professional, his experienced counsel leads Vancouverites in his west side community to place their trust in a man passionate about his work. Uncompromising ethics bring a balanced approach to realizing your real estate dreams.

When Life Moves You - contact Larry:

*Disclaimer: Statistics Courtesy REBGV. While believed to be accurate they are not guaranteed.
**Numbers provided may vary as they are dynamically posted by the REBGV.

Reader Comments:

Olga Says:
May 27th, 2012 at 12:57 am

Although it makes all sense to implement some rules that would prevent the owners from hiding the problems from the potential buyer and deferring the necessary repairs, it does increase the cost of condo ownership yet again – these reports are costly.
And I do not know Larry what do you mean by “law does not require that the funding requirements identified in the depreciation report be implemented”. By the latest Strata Property Act, council members personally and Strata could be held responsible for not taking an action to fix any material damages to a property especially if in result the damage worsened due to letting it go as it is. As understand it means that as soon as report stated the problem it is an obligation for a council to disclose the problem on the GM and to move forward its fixing.

May 27th, 2012 at 4:57 am

@Olga,
“law does not require that the funding requirements identified in the depreciation report be implemented”

yes there does seem to be a disconnect however, my understanding of this is –
“the strata now knows what’s wrong but it just hasn’t figured out how it going to pay for it”
which I gather from this lawyer’s writing suggests that this does not mean the same thing as not taking action as you describe.

In theory this new law was designed to provide some transparency aimed at helping buyers, lenders and owners obtain a more clear picture of future maintenance cost expectations and with that information in hand, facilitate future planning.

As to increasing cost of condo ownership – I suppose it will but in other ways it may be a more economical route to follow as this should provide a clear path for maintenance schedules and budget requirements. Olga while your strata may be very proactive in doing this work on behalf of the yourself and other owners and my sense of it is that this is not the case for the majority.

Jim Flaherty Says:
May 27th, 2012 at 8:49 am

Off topic here. Larry, from visiting your website and looking at the daily numbers, it looks like May has really added a whack load of homes to the market. Just by me guessing, I would say it could be a record breaking month for total listings added in a month. And getting oh so close to 20k. Well, you have the real #’s, you can elaborate on this.

Thanks for the great work!!!!

Olga Says:
May 27th, 2012 at 11:13 am

There are only 2 ways for the Strata to pay for the repairs – a special assessment or an increase in the monthly management fee with the goal of increasing of contingency reserves. But it all makes a sense because the timely done repair might be much cheaper than the one that gets differed and the problem worsened.
I was a head of the condo strata council for 10 years – before I happily sold my townhouse on a top of its price in the middle of the last summer. The prices for the townhouses in Richmond are slowly sliding since then. (Thanks to Ben Rabidoux for the insight).

May 27th, 2012 at 8:48 pm

@olga,

“There are only 2 ways for the Strata to pay for the repairs”
Nothing new about that but… you would be amazed at how some strata groups put off the inevitable for years on end.

Jim Flaherty Says:
May 28th, 2012 at 7:55 pm

Larry,

Nice sale on the w 12 ave home. I’m impressed that you found a sucker to bite on that one. If only I can find one like you did. My home has been on the market for 2 months and with only 4 showings. I’m in Burnaby.

May 29th, 2012 at 7:48 am

@jim

1 low ball builder and 3 above asking price. Don’t think purchaser was a ‘sucker’.

It has the combination of being a solid house on a prime Kits lot with some rock and roll history.

Oh and while I’m polishing the brass, the seller also chose an experienced Realtor. :)

Jim Flaherty Says:
May 30th, 2012 at 8:37 am

By this time next year, I’m sure this buyer will regret their purchase. I have a relative that previously worked with a top 1% realtor. He had told my relative that prices will be coming down and possibly crash. Experience is not always the key to the future. A clear vision and a belief of reality is. I’ve been a believer of “it’s different”, for many years. Things have changed. We all need to adjust to what is going on outside.

Alex Says:
June 1st, 2012 at 7:19 pm

Larry, that w12th home is beautiful- so wish we could raise our daughter and growing family there! Anyway, hope the new owners will love it as much as I did from afar. Congrats on the sale. Thought you/ the owners priced it fairly for the current market.

Devore Says:
June 9th, 2012 at 5:05 pm

“Although it makes all sense to implement some rules that would prevent the owners from hiding the problems from the potential buyer and deferring the necessary repairs, it does increase the cost of condo ownership yet again – these reports are costly.”

Boohoo? These reports should have been available for condo buyers from day 1. It’s part of the cost of condo ownership. Nobody’s fault except the buyers and owners that their condos are so expensive, and they failed to account for the monthly and annual costs of running a condo which they may have trouble affording. It’s not a bungalow. Condo buyers should be placing a significant discount on condo units due to the high (AND NECESSARY) maintenance and operating costs, and risk of future liabilities. Ownership costs isn’t just the monthly mortgage payment.

Devore Says:
June 9th, 2012 at 5:14 pm

Furthermore, it’s shortsighted thinking. A depreciation report will allow the strata to plan for preventative maintenance, using ongoing funds from the condo fees (which will increase no doubt), and avoid the major and emergency repairs funded by special assessment typically needed when maintenance is deferred. Had this planning been in place from day 1, and funds collected by the strata to cover everything, condo owners will actually SAVE money over the long term. A well maintained building is cheaper to operate. And there are no surprise $50,000 special assessments, which surely don’t make condo ownership “more affordable”?

Comment On This Post

will not be published
http://www.yourwebsite.com