<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vancouver&#8217;s Fish Story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yattermatters.com/real-estate/vancouvers-fish-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yattermatters.com/real-estate/vancouvers-fish-story/</link>
	<description>Insight on Vancouver Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:56:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.yattermatters.com/real-estate/vancouvers-fish-story/comment-page-1/#comment-15113</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yattermatters.com/?p=5472#comment-15113</guid>
		<description>What I have always found puzzling about the &quot;affordability&quot; numbers is that they use pretax income.

Let&#039;s assume that you need to have a family income of $200,000 to buy a house on the west side. At $200,000 you are in a tax rate of over 30% (if it&#039;s split, if it&#039;s not, it&#039;s more). If it costs 65% of pre-tax income, isn&#039;t that nearly the same as 95% of after-tax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I have always found puzzling about the &#8220;affordability&#8221; numbers is that they use pretax income.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume that you need to have a family income of $200,000 to buy a house on the west side. At $200,000 you are in a tax rate of over 30% (if it&#8217;s split, if it&#8217;s not, it&#8217;s more). If it costs 65% of pre-tax income, isn&#8217;t that nearly the same as 95% of after-tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
